Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ann Li vs Jamie Loeb Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Li vs Loeb analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Ann Li vs Jamie Loeb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Li 2 - 1 Loeb
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Li has won 45.68% of points on their second serve, while Loeb has won 46.95%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Li, in recent form, has won 56.5% of their opponent's second serve points, while Loeb has won 54.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.23% and 38.01% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Li has saved 57.31% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Loeb has saved 55.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Li has won 56.9% of matches played (W/L 33/ 25), with Loeb winning 46.3% (W/L 25/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Li has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 64/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 7/ 14). Loeb has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 33/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 8/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Li has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.54% of matches (W/L 24/ 17), where as Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48% of matches (W/L 24/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Li winning 2 times and Loeb being victorious 1 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Li winning 5 and Loeb winning 3. The last match between Li and Loeb was at the W100 Bonita Springs, 04-05-2023, Second, Clay with Ann Li getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Li and Loeb have played a deciding set 2 times, with Li winning 1 times and Loeb 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Li winning 0, and Loeb 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Li has played against opponents with an average rank of 231.36 while Loeb has played against players with an average rank of 287.76.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Li has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Loeb has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Li has converted 49.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Loeb has converted 45.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
143
Rank
44
High
24
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
1
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
302
Rank
132
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
59% (207-141)
Career Total W/L
54% (295-248)
56% (19-15)
YTD W/L
50% (15-15)
$1,188,186
Career Prize Money
$219,866
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Ann Li vs Jamie Loeb For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Li VS Loeb
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Ann Li | Jamie Loeb |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 3 |
| Games Won | 41 | 32 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 4 |
| DFs Total | 11 | 16 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:40 | 1:43:40 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (141/229) | 56% (128/230) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (91/141) | 58% (74/128) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (35/88) | 39% (40/102) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 49% (18/37) | 48% (14/29) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (116/230) | 45% (103/229) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Ann Li
Player
Jamie Loeb
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| 4-6 6-1 6-1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Jamie Loeb
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
81
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| 3-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Ann Li
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ann Li | Jamie Loeb |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (19/15) | 50% (15/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (46/39) | 53% (38/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (403/373) | 52% (341/318) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 67% (8/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 70% (16/7) | 50% (6/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 20% (1/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.23 | 0.27 |
| Aces Total | 86 | 88 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 82 | 118 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:26 | 1:46:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 262.41 | 291.9 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1547/2613) | 55% (1151/2087) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (962/1547) | 66% (763/1151) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (487/1066) | 47% (439/935) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (156/316) | 46% (115/252) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (1160/2532) | 44% (954/2151) |
| Slam W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (15/10) | 52% (15/14) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (19/33) | 52% (15/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 50% (4/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (9/16) | 36% (4/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (18/6) | 14% (14/2) |
Ann Li Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Dominika Salkova
Player
Ann Li
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Viktoriya Tomova
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
51%
(
41 of
81)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
47%
(
50 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Elvina Kalieva
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Martina Trevisan
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
45%
(
24 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
52%
(
42 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
56%
(
53 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
67 of
112)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
59 of
112)
114
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Ann Li
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Isabella Shinikova
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Ann Li
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Nuria Brancaccio
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
78%
(
65 of
83)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Jamie Loeb
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marie Weckerle
Player
Jamie Loeb
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
99)
4
Aces
5
11
Double Faults
11
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
54 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Kulikova
Player
Jamie Loeb
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
8
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
9
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
53%
(
57 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
41%
(
21 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
48 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Jamie Loeb
56%
(
54 of
97)
1st Serve %
50%
(
50 of
100)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Ana Sofia Sanchez
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Sophie Chang
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Katrina Scott
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(9) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Li Vs Loeb Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Li are available here and Loeb photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
